Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 has a general score of 85.2, which is better than the Moto Z Play's 74.4 general score. Galaxy F41's construction is a lot newer than the Moto Z Play's, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy F41 has the older 11 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a bit sharper display than Moto Z Play, because it has a bigger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit more pixels per inch of display. The Motorola Moto Z Play has a slightly better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy F41, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy F41 has just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy F41 also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy F41 features a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a 71 percent greater battery size. Galaxy F41 has a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy F41 also has a larger aperture to capture better captures in low-light environments and a much better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.