Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is better than the Moto Z Play, with an 88.1 score against 74.4. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F62 has 11 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy F62 is a notably newer cellphone than Moto Z Play, although it's noticeably heavier and way thicker.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a quite worse pixel number per inch of display, it also counts with a larger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a little better performance than Moto Z Play, because although it has 4 less cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z Play, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Play, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3510mAh.
The Galaxy F62 has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy F62 also has a bigger camera aperture and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.