Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Motorola Moto Z Play, getting a 98.9 score against 74.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version while Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is extremely newer than the Motorola Moto Z Play, it's thicker and extremely heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better display than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a larger screen and a just a bit higher amount of pixels in each inch in the display. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Moto Z Play, because although it has an external SD slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better camera than Moto Z Play, because it has a back-facing camera with much more MP, a larger aperture for better low-light images and a lot higher video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with longer battery life than Moto Z Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way more expensive than the Moto Z Play, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.