Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
SprintSM-N910P
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2014-09-03 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (825 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 20 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 4 is a bit better than the Moto Z Play, having an 81.6 score against 74.4. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 4 has an older 5.0 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo. Galaxy Note 4 is a better cellphone than the Moto Z Play, it must be noted that it is also a way older, a little heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone.
Galaxy Note 4 counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto Z Play, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Galaxy Note 4 also counts with an additional GPU. The Galaxy Note 4 has a more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a quite bigger display, a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
Motorola Moto Z Play features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 4, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Play also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z Play counts with just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Note 4, because it has a 3510mAh battery size.
The Galaxy Note 4 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z Play, although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photos and/or video in low light environments, they both have the same video frame rate, the same video resolution and a same resolution back camera.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy Note 4 is also cheaper than the Motorola Moto Z Play.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.