Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note Edge
AT&TSM-N915A
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2014-09-03 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 525 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 18 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Edge is just a bit better than Moto Z Play, getting a score of 81.7 against 74.4. Galaxy Note Edge's construction is much older, somewhat thicker and a little heavier than Moto Z Play. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note Edge has an older 5.0 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy Note Edge has a much better screen than Moto Z Play, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy Note Edge counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto Z Play, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy Note Edge also counts with a GPU.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Edge has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play, although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photographs in low-light situations, they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with a 16 mega pixels resolution.
Moto Z Play features a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note Edge, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Moto Z Play also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Play features a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Note Edge, because it has 3510mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy Note Edge not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola Moto Z Play.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.