Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-04 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is better than Motorola Moto Z Play, getting an 89 score against 74.4. Galaxy Note10's construction is notably newer than Motorola Moto Z Play's, but it is a little thicker and a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a little sharper display than Moto Z Play, because although it has a little inferior pixel count in each inch in the display, it also counts with a bit larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a little bit better memory for apps and games than Moto Z Play, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note10 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note10 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Moto Z Play, because although it has a way lower 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a way bigger aperture for better images in low light situations. The Galaxy Note10 features a battery performance that's just as good as the battery duration in Moto Z Play, although the Galaxy Note10 has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3510mAh.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z Play. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Motorola Moto Z Play, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.