Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-04 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z Play's 74.4 score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 has older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy S10's design is way newer and just a little bit lighter, but also a bit thicker than Motorola Moto Z Play.
Galaxy S10 features a little better performance than Moto Z Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 features a brighter display than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a better screen pixel density, a bit bigger screen and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
Galaxy S10 has more storage to install games and applications than Moto Z Play, because although it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Moto Z Play features just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has a 3 percent more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a worse video quality and a lot less mega pixels camera, it also counts with a way bigger aperture for better low light photography and videos.
The Galaxy S10 is a little more expensive than the Moto Z Play, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.