Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-04 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is way better than the Moto Z Play, having a 93.6 score against 74.4. Galaxy S10 5G is a newer phone than the Moto Z Play, but it is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S10 5G has the previous 11 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little sharper display than Moto Z Play, because it has a way better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution, a greater display pixel density and a bigger screen. The Galaxy S10 5G has a little bit better memory for games and applications than Moto Z Play, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with greater battery life than Moto Z Play, because it has a 28% more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Moto Z Play, because although it has a back facing camera with way less mega pixels resolution and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a much bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and video.
Galaxy S10 5G costs more than the Moto Z Play, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.