Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is a lot better than the Motorola Moto Z Play, getting an 89.7 score against 74.4. The Galaxy S10 Lite design is way newer than Motorola Moto Z Play's, but it is thicker and somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit sharper display than Moto Z Play, because although it has a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a little faster CPU than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite shoots way better photos and videos than Moto Z Play, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Moto Z Play, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy S10 Lite has longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3510mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola Moto Z Play.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.