Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has an overall score of 90.8, which is way better than Motorola Moto Z Play's 74.4 overall score. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Although the Galaxy S20 FE is way newer than Motorola Moto Z Play, it's thicker and heavier.
Galaxy S20 FE features just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 FE features a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a larger display and a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a little bit better camera than Moto Z Play, because although it has a camera with lot less mega pixels resolution and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture. Galaxy S20 FE features a very superior storage for games and applications than Moto Z Play, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S20 FE features improved battery duration than Moto Z Play, because it has a 28 percent greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy S20 FE is way more expensive than Moto Z Play, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.