Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is way better than the Moto Z Play, having a 93.4 score against 74.4. Galaxy S22's construction is noticeably newer than Moto Z Play's, but it's just a bit heavier and a little thicker. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 has the older 13 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy S22 counts with a bit better performance than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a lot better display than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a bit larger display.
Moto Z Play features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S22, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a much better video resolution, a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better images in low light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
The Galaxy S22 costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z Play, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.