Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto Z Play's 74.4 global score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version and Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is noticeably newer than Motorola Moto Z Play, it's way heavier and thicker.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better display than Moto Z Play, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a larger display and a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Motorola Moto Z Play counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little bit better processing power than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 5 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a superior battery life than Moto Z Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z Play, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited environments, a way higher resolution camera in the back and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto Z Play, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.