Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a global score of 85.6, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z Play's global score of 74.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto Z Play, it's a little thinner and also incredibly newer. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit better performance than Moto Z Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit better display than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a larger display, a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636px resolution.
Moto Z Play has much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z Play has just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 3510mAh battery size.
Moto Z Play counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photographs and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z Play. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z Play, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.