Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is way better than Moto Z Play's 74.4 global score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction has the same thickness than Moto Z Play, but it's just a little heavier. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better display than Moto Z Play, because it has a bigger screen, a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite greater screen density. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z Play, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Moto Z Play has a little better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 3510mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a much less mega pixels back camera and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better captures in low light environments.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot more expensive than Moto Z Play, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.