Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 94.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2021-01-26 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 2500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 22.92 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia PRO is way better than Moto Z Play, with a score of 94.3 against 74.4. Xperia PRO is a extremely newer phone than Moto Z Play, although it's thicker and a lot heavier. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS, but the Xperia PRO has the older 10 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Sony Xperia PRO has a much better looking screen than Moto Z Play, because it has a bigger display, a lot better resolution of 1644 x 3840px and a lot better amount of pixels per inch of display. Xperia PRO has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z Play, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Xperia PRO has a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xperia PRO also has more RAM memory. Xperia PRO takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z Play, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
Xperia PRO has a little better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Sony Xperia PRO is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z Play. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Sony Xperia PRO, otherwise you can save some money and get the Moto Z Play, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.