Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a global score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than Moto Z Play's overall score of 74.4. TCL 20 Pro 5G's construction is newer than the Moto Z Play's, but it is extremely thicker and heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but TCL 20 Pro 5G has the older 11 version while Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. TCL 20 Pro 5G features a screen that is very similar to the display in Motorola Moto Z Play, because although the TCL 20 Pro 5G has a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger display.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a 28 percent greater battery size.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much better camera than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a way higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.