Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2024-09-26 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14T Pro has a general score of 84.5, which is better than the Moto Z Play's general score of 74.4. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi 14T Pro has 14 version while Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Xiaomi 14T Pro body is incredibly newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than Moto Z Play.
Moto Z Play counts with a way better performance than Xiaomi 14T Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with an incredibly better looking display than Moto Z Play, because it has a bigger display, a higher 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution and a bit greater amount of pixels in each inch of screen.
Xiaomi 14T Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z Play, because it has a way better video resolution, a larger camera aperture and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back. The Xiaomi 14T Pro features a slightly better memory to install applications and games than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Moto Z Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.