Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is better than Motorola Moto Z Play, having a general score of 84.3 against 74.4. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has 14 version while Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 construction is notably newer and thinner, but also notably heavier than Motorola Moto Z Play.
The Moto Z Play counts with a much powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a lot better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a much higher 2224 x 2488 pixels resolution, a just a little greater display density and a lot larger display.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a way better camera than Moto Z Play, because it has a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a bigger aperture and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a little bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a really longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a 5100mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.