Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-04 | 2019-11-20 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.09 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is much better than the Moto Z Play, with a overall score of 83.7 against 74.4. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has 10 version while Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Xiaomi Mi Note 10's construction is extremely newer than the Moto Z Play's, but it is notably thicker and much heavier.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has a little bit better looking display than Moto Z Play, because although it has a just a little worse number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 features a bit better processing power than Moto Z Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 shoots way better videos and photos than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 also has a larger camera aperture and a way more mega pixels camera. The Moto Z Play counts with a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 features a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a 50% bigger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 costs more money than Motorola Moto Z Play, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.