Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-05-09 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a little bit better than Moto Z Play, getting a overall score of 80.6 against 74.4. Even though the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is noticeably newer than Moto Z Play, it is a lot thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has the older 11 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a little bit better display than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a larger screen. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Moto Z Play has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a lot better camera than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has a larger diafragm aperture for better photos in low light situations and a lot more mega pixels camera.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a much better battery lifetime than Moto Z Play, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite costs more than Moto Z Play, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.