Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is much better than the Moto Z Play, with a overall score of 82.4 against 74.4. These devices have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has 11 version while Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro design is newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than the Moto Z Play.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a much better looking screen than Moto Z Play, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola Moto Z Play has just a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Play, because it has a 43% more battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much better camera than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a larger camera aperture and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola Moto Z Play, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.