Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-04 | -- |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is better than the Moto Z Play, having a score of 86.1 against 74.4. These devices include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has an older 11 version while Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a thicker and much heavier cellphone than the Moto Z Play.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a little sharper display than Moto Z Play, because it has a lot higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels, a larger screen and a just a little better pixels count per inch in the screen.
The Moto Z Play has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro captures greater photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and video and a way better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.