Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro is much better than the Moto Z, getting an 84.9 score against 74.5. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro body is extremely newer, but notably thicker and heavier than the Moto Z. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while Moto Z comes with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The iPhone 11 Pro counts with a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a bit worse 1125 x 2436px resolution and a quite inferior pixels quantity in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit larger screen. The Moto Z has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The iPhone 11 Pro has a quite better processing power than Moto Z, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone 11 Pro also has a 64-bit CPU and a greater number of cores. The iPhone 11 Pro takes a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z, although it has a worse resolution back camera and a lower (4K) video definition, they both have a same size aperture.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 3046mAh battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone 11 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.