Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone SE (2022) is much better than Moto Z, getting an 86.6 score against 74.5. Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Moto Z comes with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. Apple iPhone SE (2022)'s design is newer than the Moto Z's, but it is thicker and a bit heavier. Apple iPhone SE (2022) has a quite superior hardware performance than Moto Z, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone SE (2022) also has more CPU cores and a 64-bits processor.
The Motorola Moto Z has a little sharper screen than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a bigger screen, a lot more pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) captures slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z, although it has a back-facing camera with lesser mega-pixels and a lower (4K) video resolution, they both have the same camera aperture.
Motorola Moto Z features a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z has superior battery performance than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has 2600mAh of battery capacity.
IPhone SE (2022) is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.