Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.73 x 3.06 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black Glare |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone II has a general score of 88, which is better than Moto Z's 74.5 general score. The Asus ROG Phone II is a extremely newer cellphone than the Moto Z, although it is incredibly heavier and thicker. The Moto Z has a little bit better screen than Asus ROG Phone II, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Asus ROG Phone II counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Moto Z, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Asus ROG Phone II features just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Asus ROG Phone II takes much better pictures and videos than Moto Z, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the Asus ROG Phone II also has better 60 fps video frame rates and a lot more MP back facing camera. Asus ROG Phone II has a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has a 131 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.