Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 has a general score of 77, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z's 74.5 global score. Although it's the best in this comparison, the LG V20 is a heavier and much thicker phone than the Motorola Moto Z. The Moto Z features a little more vivid display than LG V20, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, the Moto Z also counts with a just a little higher pixel number in each display inch.
Moto Z has just a bit better performance than LG V20. They have 4 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. LG V20 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the LG V20 also has a back facing camera with a better resolution.
LG V20 counts with more memory for apps and games than Moto Z, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V20 also has 64 GB internal memory capacity. The LG V20 features improved battery life than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 3200mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the LG V20 is also a lot cheaper, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.