Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 534 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is much better than Motorola Moto Z, with an 84.7 score against 74.5. The Galaxy A32 is a extremely newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z, but it's incredibly heavier and a lot thicker. The Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, while Motorola Moto Z comes with Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
The Moto Z has a sharper display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better display density and a much higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Galaxy A32 counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto Z, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy A32 also has a higher number of cores.
Galaxy A32 captures much clearer photos and videos than Moto Z, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also has a lot better resolution back-facing camera. Galaxy A32 counts with a little bit better memory for games and applications than Moto Z, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.