Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A60 is much better than the Motorola Moto Z, getting an 82.3 score against 74.5. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A60 has an older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though Galaxy A60 is notably newer than the Motorola Moto Z, it's much thicker and heavier.
The Moto Z counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with a bit better processing power than Moto Z, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto Z features a very superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy A60, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A60 features just a bit better camera than Moto Z, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A60 also has a camera with a higher resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video.
The Galaxy A60 counts with longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 31 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.