Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto Z's 74.5 global score. The Galaxy A71 5G body is incredibly newer, but much thicker and notably heavier than Motorola Moto Z. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 5G has an older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Moto Z features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z, because although it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G captures greater photos and videos than Moto Z, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality and the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a much better resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy A71 5G is more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.