Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is better than Moto Z's 74.5 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A80 is a notably newer cellphone than the Moto Z, but it's way heavier and notably thicker. Galaxy A80 has a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and more cpu cores.
Moto Z counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Galaxy A80 takes much better photos and videos than Moto Z, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 48 MP resolution.
Moto Z features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A80, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a way better battery performance than Moto Z, because it has a 42 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.