Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has an overall score of 90.5, which is much better than Moto Z's 74.5 score. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, and Moto Z comes with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's design is newer than the Moto Z's, although it's way thicker and heavier.
The Galaxy A90 5G has just a little better performance than Moto Z, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto Z counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixels amount per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a better storage to store more games and applications than Moto Z, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a greater camera than Moto Z, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.