Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-09-01 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a general score of 81, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z's 74.5 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro construction is much heavier and incredibly thicker than Motorola Moto Z. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has an older 6.0 Marshmallow version while Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy C9 Pro has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The Moto Z features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola Moto Z takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lesser megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger aperture. The Motorola Moto Z has more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.