Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13 |
| 2016-09-01 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3080 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 500 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 69.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S23 Ultra is just a bit better than Moto Z, getting an 81.5 score against 74.5. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S23 Ultra has 13 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy S23 Ultra's construction is noticeably thicker but incredibly lighter than Moto Z.
The Motorola Moto Z features a much better performing CPU than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory and lesser CPU cores (although they are faster). Moto Z counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel density.
The Galaxy S23 Ultra shoots much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a bigger aperture. Moto Z counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S23 Ultra has a superior battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has a 92 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.