Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is a bit better than the Moto Z, getting a 78.8 score against 74.5. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X60 Pro has the older 11 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although vivo X60 Pro is much newer than Moto Z, it's thicker and much heavier. Vivo X60 Pro has a better processing power than Moto Z, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and 4 more cores.
Moto Z has a little sharper display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per inch in the screen. Vivo X60 Pro has a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also has faster 60 fps video frame rate and a lot higher resolution back camera. Vivo X60 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Moto Z, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.