Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than the Motorola Moto Z, getting a general score of 85.5 against 74.5. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a newer cellphone than Motorola Moto Z, but it's a lot heavier and extremely thicker. Motorola Moto Z counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel quantity per inch in the display.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little faster CPU than Moto Z, because it has a greater amount of RAM and more CPU cores. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z, although it has a worse (4K) video quality, a worse resolution camera in the back and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light images and video.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z, because although it has an external SD slot that admits up to 256 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much better battery duration than Moto Z, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.