Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-08-10 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is slightly better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a overall score of 81.3 against 77.4. Although it's the best cellphone we are comparing here, it must be noted that it's also older, a lot thicker and somewhat heavier. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a bit better performance than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has more cpu cores.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel XL. Both have an equal resolution of 1440 x 2560, a display with the same size and a better pixel number per screen inch. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a very superior storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel XL features better battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3450mAh battery size. Google Pixel XL captures slightly better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Google Pixel XL also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a more MP back camera.
The Google Pixel XL costs a little more money than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.