Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2017-08-10 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is slightly better than LG V20, getting a global score of 77.4 against 77. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's construction is newer, incredibly thinner and lighter than LG V20. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit sharper screen than LG V20, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels in each screen inch.
The LG V20 counts with as much memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the Moto Z2 Force Edition, both of them have a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and equal 64 GB internal memory. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit superior processing unit than LG V20, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has more cores.
LG V20 has greater battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity. LG V20 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG V20 also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor, a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a larger aperture.
Although Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Moto Z2 Force Edition, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG V20, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.