Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a global score of 87.6, which is better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's global score of 77.4. The LG V60 ThinQ is a a lot newer phone than Moto Z2 Force Edition, although it's way heavier and thicker. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a slightly better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher number of pixels per inch of screen.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a greater storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more internal memory. LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a way more mega pixels back facing camera, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a larger aperture. LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2730mAh.
The LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.