Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Force Edition is a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a score of 77.4 against 76.4. Moto Z2 Force Edition's body is notably newer, noticeably thinner and lighter than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a bit greater screen pixel density. The Motorola Droid Turbo captures slightly better photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has much more memory for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size.
Although Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Moto Z2 Force Edition, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.