Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is just a bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's general score of 77.4. The Motorola DROID Turbo is better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, we must tell that it's also an a lot older, heavier and incredibly thicker cellphone. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 2560 x 1440, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a little better screen pixel density.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with just a bit better performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional GPU. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has slower 24 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Motorola DROID Turbo is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.