Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is just a bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a overall score of 81.2 against 77.4. Even though Motorola Edge 50 is noticeably newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's much heavier and noticeably thicker. Motorola Edge 50 has a bit better screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a little bit lower screen density and a little bit worse 1220 x 2712 resolution, it also counts with a larger screen.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and video, a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a way better battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.