Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 800.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a overall score of 79.8 against 77.4. The Motorola One Hyper is a noticeably newer phone than Moto Z2 Force Edition, although it's much heavier and incredibly thicker. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola One Hyper. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Motorola One Hyper takes much clearer photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography.
The Motorola One Hyper has a little bit better storage for games and applications than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola One Hyper counts with a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Motorola One Hyper is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.