Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-08-10 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 534 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, with an 84.7 score against 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a newer phone than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it is extremely heavier and notably thicker. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a lot better looking display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a much higher pixel count per inch of screen. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A32, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features a superior camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a lot better resolution back camera and a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has an 83 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.