Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A60 has a general score of 82.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 global score. The Galaxy A60 body is newer, but extremely thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A60, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 shoots slightly better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A60 also has a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a larger aperture for better low-light photography and video.
The Galaxy A60 has improved battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.