Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a 91.8 score against 77.4. The Galaxy A71 5G design is notably newer, but a lot thicker and way heavier than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Galaxy A71 5G features a processing unit that's very similar to the Moto Z2 Force Edition one, and although the Galaxy A71 5G has a larger amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A71 5G has a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has an external memory slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 65% greater battery capacity. Galaxy A71 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a way bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a larger aperture to capture better images in low-light environments.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy A71 5G is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.