Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 has an overall score of 84.9, which is a bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A80 construction is newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it's way heavier and way thicker. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little faster processor than Galaxy A80, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A80, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A80 has a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3700mAh battery size against 2730mAh. The Galaxy A80 features a superior camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A80 also has a way bigger camera sensor and a camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.