Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a score of 90.5 against 77.4. Galaxy A90 5G's body is a lot newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it is extremely thicker and a lot heavier. The Galaxy A90 5G features a bit superior processor than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a bit better screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater screen pixel density. Galaxy A90 5G takes way better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a way more mega-pixels back camera and a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a very superior battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 65% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.