Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-08-10 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a general score of 81 against 77.4. Despite being the best cellphone in our current comparison, Galaxy C9 Pro's construction is way heavier and thicker than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better count of pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing images or videos in low-light environments and a lot worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much better battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.