Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 70.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2014-04-29 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.41 x 2.79 x 0.65 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 819.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 5 Hexa chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz + Dual-Core 1700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | ARM Mali-T624 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 5.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 2430mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 14 hours talk time |
| 4.72 | 4.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is much better than Galaxy K Zoom, with a general score of 77.4 against 70.3. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition design is noticeably newer, extremely lighter and noticeably thinner than Galaxy K Zoom. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit sharper display than Galaxy K Zoom, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a lot more pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with much more memory for apps and games than Galaxy K Zoom, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy K Zoom, because it has 2 more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy K Zoom, because it has 2730mAh of battery capacity against 2430mAh. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy K Zoom, because although it has a lot smaller sensor taking less light and washed colors and a camera with a way lower 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.