Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31s is much better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting an 88 score against 77.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy M31s is much newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, it is way heavier and notably thicker. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a slightly bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy M31s, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy M31s has a processing unit that's very similar to the processing unit in Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although the Galaxy M31s has 2 GB more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy M31s captures way better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has a much better resolution back camera, a larger aperture to capture better low light images and videos and a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy M31s counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 120% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.